Water sustainability – where are the jobs?

April 6, 2009

It has begun. Government money is starting to flow into water sustainability here in Australia, and we are starting to see the emergence of real jobs in the area.

Because water has so many aspects, and any kind of water resource has a gazillion stakeholders, water sustainability is inherently a cross-disciplinary pursuit. You must cross-over the natural and engineered water-cycles and hence have a working knowledge of both hydrology/hydrogeology and civil/chemical engineering. You have to know behavioural science, economics and finance, advanced project management techniques, water science and urban planning.

I already have job opportunities for these people, so if you are one then get in touch!


we dont need water people

March 11, 2009

visited a major water utility today. The hr manager told me they don’t really hire people with water industry experience. my jaw dropped; how can you run a water utility without water people?


The wicked problem of creating water sustainable cities

February 23, 2009

I am blogging from the Sydney Water Sensitive Cities Workshop. The conference has been a mix of presentations by leaders in the area, and workshops by attendees and has been  co-hosted by the International Water Centre, the National Urban Water Governance Program and Monash University.

The attendees come from all sorts of organisations, but because local government in Australia has responsibility for managing urban planning and stormwater, there are a lot of local government people here. Professions represented are engineers, landscape architects and scientists.

It has been made clear that we are very much at the beginning of the journey towards water sustainable cities.

Listening to the views of the urban planners and architects, it was an interesting insight to hear that water sustainability can be a driver for creating more livable, greener cities that are just more pleasant places to be. Yet again Singapore has emerged as a leader in WSUD, with Tony Wong from EDAW presenting the work they have done to increase the utility provided by Singapore’s waterways, converting concrete channels into water parks with integrated stormwater management and treatment.

The unfortunate reality is that our cities here in Australia are still very poor at managing water, and there is so much to be done in terms of regulation and governance to create water sensitive cities. One striking feature and focus of this conference has been wicked problems and the challenge of  driving change in a complex sociopolitical environment.


World Economic Forum Water Report

February 17, 2009

The World Economic Forum recently released a draft report on the world’s water supply situation. It is pretty grim reading, with the focus being on the water-food nexus and the water-energy nexus.  There are plenty of indicators in here of where water businesses should be focusing their efforts though.

If you look at the water inputs to produce the amount of food consumed by people on certain income levels, then extrapolate according to income/population growth forecasts, then you find we don’t have close to enough water to produce the food we will need. In fact by 2025 30% of the global cereal crop could be lost through lack of water.

Energy production is also highly dependent on water supply for cooling power stations and in some parts of the world this has already become a limiting factor.

Finally there is the demand for water for cities, which are rapidly drawing down  water available in their catchments.

In this post I try and focus on opportunities, rather than dwell on the negative, and this is where there seems to be an obvious role for business.

Food: Irrigation efficiency is an obvious target, with around 50% of water drawn for irrigation being lost to leaks and evaporation. Demand for pipes should continue! Innovative irrigation systems and low water consumption crops will be another growth area.

Energy: There has to be a market for retrofitting power stations with non-consumptive cooling systems. I have seen a presentation on this, and while it is expensive, it is possible to replace evaporative systems with closed-system cooling. It looks a bit tricky though, so the engineering firm that takes the first-movers advantage in this area should do well. Of course wind-power has almost zero water consumption, which is great, but I would not be putting my money into hydro in many places. Australia’s hydro power schemes have already reduced output due to lack of water.

Cities: As well as the obvious desalination and blackwater reuse option, which is becoming cheaper and more energy efficient every day (particularly with Forward Osmosis on the way), increasing water prices may begin to make stormwater capture, treatment and reuse cost effective in more locations. There is already a big shortage of professionals with experience and knowledge of ecological engineering that is required to do this well however. Increasing pollution levels also mean that innovative advanced treatment solutions should also gain ground.

The mega-trend will be the movement of populations, agriculture and business to areas with good water security, so set up your water supply businesses there!


Hire during downturns; a message to employers

January 14, 2009

The US has seen the biggest monthly fall in employment since the ’40s and it is a similar story around the world. The talent market has turned, and I argue that now is the time to hire. Over the past couple of years I have been working with clients struggling with the lack of available engineering talent available at reasonable salaries. There is a parallel here with the stock-market as the economic bubble meant that most people had plenty of cash, but there were few good value stocks to buy.

The conventional stock market wisdom is to invest more in a down market…for the long-term investor equities are much better value now than they were this time last year. Few people do this however, either because of the fear of further short-term losses, or because of lack of cash to invest.

This also applies to the employment market. In 2009 there will be much more good talent available, with much more realistic salary expectations. Most companies will have headcount restrictions imposed, meaning that those firms with the flexibility to hire will have the pick of the great talent. I have already seen an example of this, late last year, where two hiring managers were keen to hire the same individual but due to headcount only one was able to make an offer.

So use ‘09/’10 to put together a fantastic team and come out storming in 2011. I came back from the Christmas/New Year break to an inbox full of resumes…now is the chance for the intelligent talent investor. Now excuse me, I have to go and call my broker.


The water business in Japan – part 2

December 10, 2008

Yes, another post on the water market in Japan, my current interest. You can see my previous post here.

In my previous post I outlined the limited presence of foreign companies in the Japanese market and looked briefly at where I saw the opportunities.

I have been conducting a search in the Japan market, and wanted to go into a bit more detail on the situation there. Japan introduced their own competition regulation specifically targeting the water market back in April 2002. The revised Water Works Law allows for state owned water authorities (of which there are 1,928 in Japan!) to outsource operations to private operators. This has allowed Veolia to enter the Japanese market and win a number of operations contracts with recently acquired Japanese subsidiaries.

Much of Japan’s water and wastewater infrastructure was built post-war, and many tens of billions of US dollars will have to be spent  every year to maintain and replace that infrastructure. With many local governments, and the national government, in serious debt and investment in water infrastructure currently trending downwards, there seems to be a clear need for private finance in the sector. Seems to me like a perfect scenario for PPPs.

78% of Japan’s water supply comes from rather polluted surface water, and there is a need for increasingly advanced potable water treatment. Part of the reason for this may be that only 69% of the Japanese population has access to articulated sewers. 12% of households use septic tanks, and an astounding 19% have no access to sanitation.

More on the current industry picture in the next post.


Murray Darling Basin Authority Created

December 2, 2008

The new Authority replaces the toothless Murray Darling Basin Commission, and will be able to make decisions on water allocations for the river system.

The MDB is the food-bowl of south east Australia, and a dramatic fall in runoff over the past five years had left the water in the river seriously overallocated, to the point that the river has not reached the sea for some time.

The management of the river system is a case study for future conflicts over water. It flows through the states of Queensland, NSW, Victoria and South Australia, and each state was essentially taking what they wanted from the river, and leaving little water for those at the end of the system. The federal government eventually stepped in to create an Authority that can overrule state power, but many would say that the river system is already beyond saving.

If the Australian states were independent countried, without the presence of an arbitrating federal government, it seems quite plausible that the situation could have ended in military conflict, and it signals a grim future if climate change starts to seriously impact runoff going into rivers like the Mekong.


China to spend $41b on STPs over 3 years!

November 25, 2008

As part of China’s economic stimulus package they are going to spend US$41b on building sewerage treatment plants to cover most of the country. That is a lot of money to spend in a very short time…I would think it would be a challenge to find the engineering and construction resources to do it. See the story here at china.org.cn


Vertical disaggregation of water and wastewater management in SEQ

November 24, 2008

South East Queensland ran out of water recently, triggering a multi-billion dollar infrastructure program, but also some serious governance reform. Concerned that the current model, with 25 different providers of water and wastewater services, was not even delivering water security, the state government seized control.

The management of water and sewer was taken from the local government councils in the area, and given to a number of new regional level entities created by the state government. The engineered part of the water cycle was divided into a number of sections, and a different authority given responsibility for each section.

There are now two “Bulk Supply” entities, responsible for maintaining water sources (dams, groundwater supply etc.) and water and wastewater treatment plants in the two catchments. There is a bulk transport authority, that is responsible for maintaining and operating large regional pipelines. A water-grid manager, that contracts between the different parties and takes ownership of regional water security, does not own any assets. A water and sewer reticulation business is responsible for the reticulation for the region, and three retailers will take care of the customer end. Local government will retain responsibility for stormwater management.

This looks like an attractive model for the State government. Water resources would be managed at catchment level, specialised agencies would be more efficient in accomplishing their core task. The natural monopoly elements (bulk supply and reticulation) are seperated out and given to state authorities, making room for new market entrants in supply and retail.

My question is, is how does a more decentralised, local water and wastewater management fit within this picture. Can councils feed stormwater back into the system?


Skills shortages, water shortages, salaries and the price of water

November 19, 2008

The skills shortage, particularly for civil design and construction engineers, puts inevitable inflationary pressure on salaries as firms compete for talent. However as a professional you should not automatically expect a dramatic increase in salary when you next change jobs.  The main factor influencing salaries is actually the price of water and wastewater services.

In an increasingly corporatized water sector, the amount of money that will be invested in water and wastewater is largely determined by the potential revenue streams from the investment i.e. the price of water and wastewater services. The cost of supply is one factor, as is level of demand, but they all are all trumped by political imperatives and the decisions of regulatory authorities.

South East Queensland recently faced the prospect of running out of water, and as result engaged in the construction of a massive network of pipelines and reuse plants. The cost of capacity from this scheme is in the realm of US$5000/m³/d according to the October Global Water Intelligence report, as compared to $1333/m³/d for the average global desalination scheme.  The alliance contracting model and tight timelines on the scheme meant that professionals needed to be (and could be) hired whatever the cost. Consequently we saw a significant inflationary effect on salaries for design and construction engineers, making Australian salaries some of the highest in the world. I suspect it will also result in staff being laid off in the future because they will just be too expensive to be deployed on projects where cost is more important than timeliness.

The shortage of water created the political will to spend more on infrastructure, and that will be reflected in water prices down the line. That political will to spend more on infrastructure and charge more for water is only galvanized in the face of a crisis…so if you are looking to make the big dollars, don’t assume the global skills shortage will be enough to push up your salary…look for where the next crisis will be, and head there!